- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:40:23 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
All, The minutes of this week telecon are available for review at http://www.w3.org/2009/02/11-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format below). Thanks Davy for the scribing, I have update the wiki page accordingly. Yves, could you please can remove the 'DRAFT' given that the minutes are in an excellent state? Thanks! Erick & Raphael ----- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 11 Feb 2009 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Feb/0047.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/11-mediafrag-irc Attendees Present raphael, davy, Yves, mhausenblas, Thierry Regrets Jack, Guillaume, Erik_(partial) Chair Raphael, Erik Scribe Davy Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]admin 2. [6]Michael's review of MAWG's "Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0" 3. [7]SWCG telecon 4. [8]next F2F meeting (Barcelona) 5. [9]syntax discussion 6. [10]use cases & requirements discussion 7. [11]existing technologies survey 8. [12]HTTP implementation * [13]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 11 February 2009 <mhausenblas> [14]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/ [14] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/ <Yves> "Overview.html : World readable " <Yves> [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/Overview.html ? [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/Overview.html <scribe> scribenick: davy <raphael> Scribe: Davy admin acceptance of previous minutes? <mhausenblas> +1 <raphael> Minutes: [16]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html [16] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html +1 raphael: minutes are accepted Michael's review of MAWG's "Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0" Michael: thread closed Thierry: current focus is on mapping table ... Felix will propose new text for terminology SWCG telecon next F2F meeting (Barcelona) raphael: register asap please ... quick poll for who will make it ... will make it Davy & Erik: will make it Michael: will make it raphael: fill in the form, even if you're not coming 2. Future participants Michael: try to reach Wolfgang 3. PREPARATION OF WORKING DRAFT raphael: template of doc is still pending syntax discussion raphael: any opinion about time formats to support? ... conrad, can you comment on this? <raphael> Conrad, are you happy with [17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Fe b/0032.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Feb/0032.html raphael: should we have the hour as optional? Yves: as long as the grammar is unambiguous, then it's ok close action-40 <trackbot> ACTION-40 Rephrase [18]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions to address the aspect ratio closed [18] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions yves: regarding A-41, it will be done by next week use cases & requirements discussion raphael: wait untill guillaume is back existing technologies survey <conrad> raphael, i'll reply by email regarding hours optional or not <raphael> close ACTION-23 <trackbot> ACTION-23 (together with Jean-Pierre) to add TV-Anytime also to Existing Technologies Survey closed HTTP implementation raphael: I can do now the 2-way handshake 4. ISSUES michael: regarding A-42, will be done by next week raphael: use of sub-mime types, a good idea or not? michael: yes, because it is a nice and clean approach ... no, because implementations need to adopt it raphael: should we specify the implementation in some registry or not michael: yes, you expect the specification of the behaviour of fragments <raphael> ISSUE-2 <raphael> ISSUE-2? <trackbot> ISSUE-2 -- What is the mime type of a media fragment? What is its relation with its parent resource? -- OPEN <trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/2 [19] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/2 raphael: should the mimetype of parent be equal to the fragment? michael: yes Yves: yes close ISSUE-2 <trackbot> ISSUE-2 What is the mime type of a media fragment? What is its relation with its parent resource? closed raphael: should we define a fragment for any type of resources including a thing (i.e., multiple interpretations)? Yves: fragments are related to mime types raphael: Web of data define fragments of things Yves: in this case, it is just an abstract thing Michael: thing = URI, i.e., something you can talk about, not a resource raphael: only define 'media' fragments or also more abstract fragments? ... use case: chorus in a song, song can be matched on various representations michael: concrete representation of a fragment can only be an information resource raphael: does the charter specify that? <mhausenblas> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 <mhausenblas> Michael: [21]http://esw.w3.org/topic/FindingResourceDescriptions [21] http://esw.w3.org/topic/FindingResourceDescriptions raphael: this issue is about things that have multiple representations (cfr. song example) ... skip 5. Implementation ... AOB? ... no, meeting adjourned Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 13:23:37 UTC