- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:40:23 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
All,
The minutes of this week telecon are available for review at
http://www.w3.org/2009/02/11-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format
below). Thanks Davy for the scribing, I have update the wiki page
accordingly.
Yves, could you please can remove the 'DRAFT' given that the minutes are
in an excellent state? Thanks!
Erick & Raphael
-----
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference
11 Feb 2009
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Feb/0047.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/11-mediafrag-irc
Attendees
Present
raphael, davy, Yves, mhausenblas, Thierry
Regrets
Jack, Guillaume, Erik_(partial)
Chair
Raphael, Erik
Scribe
Davy
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]admin
2. [6]Michael's review of MAWG's "Use Cases and Requirements
for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0"
3. [7]SWCG telecon
4. [8]next F2F meeting (Barcelona)
5. [9]syntax discussion
6. [10]use cases & requirements discussion
7. [11]existing technologies survey
8. [12]HTTP implementation
* [13]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 11 February 2009
<mhausenblas> [14]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/
[14] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/
<Yves> "Overview.html : World readable "
<Yves> [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/Overview.html ?
[15] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/Overview.html
<scribe> scribenick: davy
<raphael> Scribe: Davy
admin
acceptance of previous minutes?
<mhausenblas> +1
<raphael> Minutes:
[16]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html
[16] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html
+1
raphael: minutes are accepted
Michael's review of MAWG's "Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and
API for Media Object 1.0"
Michael: thread closed
Thierry: current focus is on mapping table
... Felix will propose new text for terminology
SWCG telecon
next F2F meeting (Barcelona)
raphael: register asap please
... quick poll for who will make it
... will make it
Davy & Erik: will make it
Michael: will make it
raphael: fill in the form, even if you're not coming
2. Future participants
Michael: try to reach Wolfgang
3. PREPARATION OF WORKING DRAFT
raphael: template of doc is still pending
syntax discussion
raphael: any opinion about time formats to support?
... conrad, can you comment on this?
<raphael> Conrad, are you happy with
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Fe
b/0032.html
[17]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Feb/0032.html
raphael: should we have the hour as optional?
Yves: as long as the grammar is unambiguous, then it's ok
close action-40
<trackbot> ACTION-40 Rephrase
[18]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
to address the aspect ratio closed
[18] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
yves: regarding A-41, it will be done by next week
use cases & requirements discussion
raphael: wait untill guillaume is back
existing technologies survey
<conrad> raphael, i'll reply by email regarding hours optional or
not
<raphael> close ACTION-23
<trackbot> ACTION-23 (together with Jean-Pierre) to add TV-Anytime
also to Existing Technologies Survey closed
HTTP implementation
raphael: I can do now the 2-way handshake
4. ISSUES
michael: regarding A-42, will be done by next week
raphael: use of sub-mime types, a good idea or not?
michael: yes, because it is a nice and clean approach
... no, because implementations need to adopt it
raphael: should we specify the implementation in some registry or
not
michael: yes, you expect the specification of the behaviour of
fragments
<raphael> ISSUE-2
<raphael> ISSUE-2?
<trackbot> ISSUE-2 -- What is the mime type of a media fragment?
What is its relation with its parent resource? -- OPEN
<trackbot>
[19]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/2
[19] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/2
raphael: should the mimetype of parent be equal to the fragment?
michael: yes
Yves: yes
close ISSUE-2
<trackbot> ISSUE-2 What is the mime type of a media fragment? What
is its relation with its parent resource? closed
raphael: should we define a fragment for any type of resources
including a thing (i.e., multiple interpretations)?
Yves: fragments are related to mime types
raphael: Web of data define fragments of things
Yves: in this case, it is just an abstract thing
Michael: thing = URI, i.e., something you can talk about, not a
resource
raphael: only define 'media' fragments or also more abstract
fragments?
... use case: chorus in a song, song can be matched on various
representations
michael: concrete representation of a fragment can only be an
information resource
raphael: does the charter specify that?
<mhausenblas> [20]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
[20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
<mhausenblas> Michael:
[21]http://esw.w3.org/topic/FindingResourceDescriptions
[21] http://esw.w3.org/topic/FindingResourceDescriptions
raphael: this issue is about things that have multiple
representations (cfr. song example)
... skip 5. Implementation
... AOB?
... no, meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--
Raphaël Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 13:23:37 UTC