- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:19:58 +1100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
I would suggest digging through this list rather than the IANA one: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/State_of_the_Art/Containers . Also note the notes in the table at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Types_of_Fragment_Addressing . I personally know about a former specification of fragments by RealNetworks, one by YouTube for their flvs & video host pages, one by Ogg of course ;-), and the MPEG one. The rtsp protocol also has one. That's as much as I know. Cheers, Silvia. On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl> wrote: > Dear Michael, > >> I guess we need an action for this. Do we have a list of media types that >> define fragment semantics handy or do I have to manually dig trough [1] in >> order to spot them? > > This is part of your action-42 :-) > But [1] might not be the only source of documentation. The MPEG-21 Part 17 > document [2] also references some potential 'reserved' mime types, though it > seems they didn't go through the RFC process. It would be interesting to > note which media types has formally or informally already define the notion > of fragments. > Cheers. > > Raphaël > >> [1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ > > [2] http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/technologies/mp21-fid/index.htm.htm > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), > Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands > e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 > Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 > Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/ >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 14:20:42 UTC