- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:04:56 +0000
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
All,
The minutes of today's call are ready for review [1]; below follows a text
dump.
Cheers,
      Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html
==========================================================================
W3C Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference
04 Feb 2009
   [2]Agenda
      [2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Feb/0009.html
   See also: [3]IRC log
      [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-irc
Attendees
   Present
          michael, raphael, davy, thierry, yves, jack, Guillaume
   Regrets
          Erik
   Chair
          Raphael
   Scribe
          mhausenblas
Contents
     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]ADMIN
         2. [6]FUTURE PARTICIPANTS
         3. [7]PREPARATION OF WORKING DRAFT
         4. [8]ISSUES
         5. [9]AOB
     * [10]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________
   <trackbot> Date: 04 February 2009
   <Gui> Gui waves everybody, long time
   <Gui> Dialing now
   <scribe> Scribenick: mhausenblas
ADMIN
   <Gui> brb
   <raphael> +1 for accepting the minutes
   raphael: accept last week's telecon
   +1
   <davy> +1
   minutes accepted
   <scribe> ACTION: michael to review Use Cases and Requirements for
   Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0 [recorded in
   [11]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01]
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01
   <trackbot> Created ACTION-39 - Review Use Cases and Requirements for
   Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0 [recorded in
   [12]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01]
   [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2009-02-11].
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01
   <scribe> -- done
   see
   [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Ja
   n/0095.html
     [13] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Jan/0095.html
   Michael: let's continue the discussion
FUTURE PARTICIPANTS
   Raphael: ACTION-18 (DailyMotion)
   <scribe> -- continues
   Erik: ACTION-21 (Cisco)
   <scribe> -- continues
   Michael: ACTION-20 (Wolfgang)
   <scribe> -- continues
PREPARATION OF WORKING DRAFT
   raphael: will attend the SW co-ordination group and report on our MF
   work
   ... will report about the feedback
   ACTION-33: Raphael to start the template of the document
   <trackbot> ACTION-33 Start the template of the document notes added
   <scribe> -- continues
   raphael: will be available today
   every person has a section responsible, please paste from Wiki and
   polish
   raphael: we use xmlspec
   jackjansen: can we agree on syntax?
   raphael: in a minute
   <Yves> ABNF
   ACTION-27: Yves to propose by email a good list of units that can be
   used
   <trackbot> ACTION-27 Propose by email a good list of units that can
   be used notes added
   <scribe> -- done
   raphael: consensus to have px and percentage
   ... ongoing discussion on having cm, etc.
   ... jackjansen objects
   jackjansen: had problems on Mac from Windows images having DPI
   measures
   raphael: conclusion pc and % and give reason why cm, et. will not be
   supported
   ... see
   [14]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
   ... will solicit feedback from the community
     [14] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
   Yves: regarding aspect ratio ...
   jackjansen: general aspect ratios might not be useful
   <raphael> Yves: aspect ratio to specify the region one would like to
   crop, for example write 3:4 or 16:9
   <Gui> Is there an actual section about the aspect ratio issue on the
   WIki?
   raphael: propose Yves to modify the current phrasing
   <scribe> ACTION: Yves to rephrase
   [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   to address the aspect ratio [recorded in
   [16]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02]
     [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   <trackbot> Created ACTION-40 - Rephrase
   [17]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   to address the aspect ratio [on Yves Lafon - due 2009-02-11].
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   raphael: Conclude syntax discussion ...
   <Gui> So aspect ratio is to help enforcing standard cropping?
   <Yves> that would be the goal
   Michael: usually ABNF
   ahm, yeah ;)
   [18]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2234.txt
     [18] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2234.txt
   <Gui> Augmented Backus-Naur Form
   sorry.
   [19]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4234.txt
     [19] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4234.txt
   raphael: volunteer to transform into ABNF
   Yves: volunteers to do it
   <scribe> ACTION: Yves to rewrite Syntax in ABNF based on RFC4234
   [recorded in
   [20]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03]
   <trackbot> Created ACTION-41 - Rewrite Syntax in ABNF based on
   RFC4234 [on Yves Lafon - due 2009-02-11].
   raphael: UC
   ... went through all reviews
   <Gui> true
   raphael: we need to take actions to implement changes
   Gui: Planned to do, still on the to do list
   raphael: till when?
   Gui: till next meeting
   <scribe> ACTION: Gui to incorporate changes proposed by reviewers
   till next meeting [recorded in
   [21]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04]
   <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Guillaume (Jean-Louis)
   <raphael> trackbot, status
   raphael: Existing Technologies Survey
   ACTION-24: Erik (through extra info from Felix) to ask Adobe (Larry)
   more info about xmpMM:Ingredients
   <trackbot> ACTION-24 (through extra info from Felix) to ask Adobe
   (Larry) more info about xmpMM:Ingredients notes added
   <scribe> -- done
   ACTION-23: Erik (together with Jean-Pierre) to add TV-Anytime also
   to Existing Technologies Survey
   <trackbot> ACTION-23 (together with Jean-Pierre) to add TV-Anytime
   also to Existing Technologies Survey notes added
   <scribe> -- continues
   ACTION-16: Erik to go through the email lists to list different
   solutions used to identify fragments, and populate the wiki
   <trackbot> ACTION-16 Go through the email lists to list different
   solutions used to identify fragments, and populate the wiki notes
   added
   <scribe> -- continues
   raphael: HTTP implementation (Raphael)
   ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he
   could implement the logic on client side
   <trackbot> ACTION-34 Look at python-url library to see whether he
   could implement the logic on client side notes added
   <scribe> -- continues
   ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
   logic could be implemented on client side
   <trackbot> ACTION-35 Look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
   logic could be implemented on client side notes added
   <scribe> -- continues
ISSUES
   ACTION-37: Raphael to summarize the clip-combining discussion
   <trackbot> ACTION-37 Summarize clip-combining discussion notes added
   <scribe> -- done
   raphael: one comment from Silvia
   <raphael> Discussion: it boils down to whether the media fragment is
   sees as in-context or out-of-context
   jackjansen: suggest to people to use some method for out of context
   <raphael>
   [22]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
   raphael: jackjansen please update on the Wiki
   [23]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
   jackjansen: currently doin it .. no need for an action
   close ISSUE-1
   <trackbot> ISSUE-1 Combining Media Fragment URI with other
   time-clipping methods closed
   ISSUE-3: Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to update MIME
   Type registrations?
   <trackbot> ISSUE-3 Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to
   update MIME Type registrations? notes added
   see
   [24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Ja
   n/0091.html
     [24] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Jan/0091.html
   <Yves> ISSUE-3?
   <trackbot> ISSUE-3 -- Does our MF URI syntax imply that we need to
   update MIME Type registrations? -- OPEN
   <trackbot>
   [25]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/3
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/issues/3
   Michael: see
   [26]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Semantics
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Semantics
   <raphael> TBL Quotes: "I think that it would be good to have a
   general rule for video/* that there is a common fragment identifier
   syntax and semantics. I think that the specification should claim
   all video/*. The W3C specification itself can be a media type
   specification... I think it can be registered in the registry as the
   spec for a MIME type."
   <jackjansen> I updated
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
     [27] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Discussion
   raphael: will approach TAG officially
   jackjansen: thought MPEG has its own hands on it?
   <scribe> ACTION: Michael to dig deeper into the video/* issue
   proposed by TimBL [recorded in
   [28]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05]
   <trackbot> Created ACTION-42 - Dig deeper into the video/* issue
   proposed by TimBL [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2009-02-11].
   jackjansen: IANA registry might be a starting point
   davy: not aware of types MPEG has
   raphael: we all have important actions (esp. ME) so let's work on it
   ... re Hypertext co-ordintation group
AOB
   raphael: part of the domain activity
   ... next Hypertext co-ordintation group meeting will be about Test
   Suites
   Michael: will summaries my experiences and issues
   raphael: gathering best practices
   s/[DONE] ACTION: michael to review Use Cases/[DONE] ACTION: michael
   to review Use Cases
   raphael: thanks and see you next week
   [adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
   [NEW] ACTION: Gui to incorporate changes proposed by reviewers till
   next meeting [recorded in
   [29]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04]
   [NEW] ACTION: Michael to dig deeper into the video/* issue proposed
   by TimBL [recorded in
   [30]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05]
   [DONE] ACTION: michael to review Use Cases and Requirements for
   Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0 [recorded in
   [31]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01]
   [NEW] ACTION: Yves to rephrase
   [32]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   to address the aspect ratio [recorded in
   [33]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Yves to rewrite Syntax in ABNF based on RFC4234
   [recorded in
   [34]http://www.w3.org/2009/02/04-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03]
     [31] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Syntax#Dimensions
   [End of minutes]
=======================
-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:05:44 UTC