- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:33:53 +1100
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Thierry, On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > > Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> Hi Thierry, all, >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> I have checked the 2 documents which are to be published next Thrusday. >>> There are a few issues which must be updated for the webmaster to publish >>> the documents in TR space. >> >> You know you can edit the document, too..? :-) > > > Sure I was about to do so. But editing the > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ > > is not the best idea. It is better to update the XML editor's copy in > http://dev.w3.org/ > (to avoid getting these errors next publication). That's where I'm editing - I thought you would have access, too? I would never edit the html file! > and I am not aware of the latest URI. Therefore I have sent the things to > fix. Yeah, I guess Erik or Raphael have to do those. > Once the document is frozen I can do the fixes before publication on the > HTML file. Maybe better done on the xml files, so we don't lose them with the next edits. >>> For the Media Fragments 1.0 >>> ------------------------------ >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ >>> >>> >>> * This version URI must be changed to >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-20091217 >> >> I wouldn't know how to do that. > > I will do that Cool. >>> * There is a broken link, >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-FPWD/tbd-diff2009xxxx.html >>> at Line: 69 >> >> This is the diff file to previous changes. Since we haven't published >> anything yet, I don't think we need this. > > But this is a *first* publication. There is no diff file to previous > changes. This should be removed. I assume you're editing the xml docs now, so I'll leave this to you. >>> Pubrules checkers [1] says that >>> >>> It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements (with >>> suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to disclosure pages): >>> >>> Include this source code: >>> <p> This document was produced by a group operating under the <a >>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/">5 February >>> 2004 >>> W3C Patent Policy</a>. W3C maintains a <a rel="disclosure" href="@@URI to >>> IPP status or other page@@">public list of any patent disclosures</a> >>> made >>> in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes >>> instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual >>> knowledge >>> of a patent which the individual believes contains <a >>> >>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">Essential >>> Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a >>> >>> href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">section >>> 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>. </p> >> >> So, should this replace the following paragraph in the introduction?: > > Right. I will do it. Do it in the xml file if you can! >>> For the Media Fragments Reqs >>> ------------------------------ >> >> I didn't make any changes there - I thought we were not going to >> re-publish this document since it was already published? > > > I read this in Erik's email latest agenda, to publish the 2 documents. > Ah yes, he does say so. I'm surprised there are still so many bugs in that document. Maybe somebody else can edit these out. I must get back to work. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 23:34:54 UTC