2009/8/22 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> > 2009/8/22 Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>: > > > > On 21 aug 2009, at 12:10, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > > >>>> I just checked HTML5 and they have done their own variant of the ISO > >>>> 8601 format, see > >>>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dates-and-times > > > > [...] > >> > >> Has SMIL got a good EBNF spec of this? If not, I can make it up. :-) > > > > > > Reasonable (at least a *lot* more reasonable than HTML5, I think). See > > < > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SMIL3-20081201/smil-timing.html#Timing-WallclockSyncValueSyntax > >. > > Ah, excellent. Thanks. I'm happy to adapt the one I used to this > unless there are objections. > To make some progress, I have just gone ahead and done it. I have used the SMIL3 specification rather than what HTML5 proposes. HTML5 includes the SMIL specification, but also has specifications for a week string (which specifices work weeks in the year). BTW: somebody should put a reference into HTML5 that their dates-and-times spec is based on SMIL3. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 02:11:50 UTC