- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:13:29 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Thanks for the trust. :-) However, I think we should review the clock time specification, see http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#clock-time At the moment it follows RTSP, e.g. t=clock:20090726T111901Z,20090726T112001Z This can be fairly unreadabe. I just checked HTML5 and they have done their own variant of the ISO 8601 format, see http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dates-and-times Examples are: "0037-12-13T00:00Z" => midnight 13th Dec 37, UTC timezone "1979-10-14T12:00:00.001-04:00" => 14th Oct 1979, midday plus 1 microsecond, UTC-4hrs The advantages are that we stay in sync with HTML, it's slightly more readable, and we provide the possibility of including timezones. What do others think about this? Cheers, Silvia. 2009/8/20 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: > Hi Silvia, > >> This is to address my ACTIONs 94, 97, and 98: >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/94 >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/97 >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/98 > > Awesome ! Thanks, I have closed these 3 actions in the tracker! > > Raphaël > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/ >
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 22:14:30 UTC