- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:54:54 +0200
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Jack, > This doesn't look right, from a design cleanliness point of view. Now we > have, for parameters that are known to refer to an empty selection, an > error for two of our axes (time, space) and the whole resource for two > other axes (id, track). If we decide to stick with this (after all: I > wasn't in the meeting, so who am I to complain:-) we need a paragraph > with a very good rationale as to why we treat these two differently. > > I think the "convenience" argument doesn't hold, because the most > convenient way to get the whole resource is to not specify the axis at > all (and I don't think we really need a convenient way to get an error > message:-). You have definitively the right to complain about this WG decision :-) I will bring this discussion on the agenda of tomorrow's teleconference (agenda to be send in a few minutes). Cheers. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 12:55:40 UTC