- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:06:39 +0200
- To: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Conrad, >> To further clarify: >> - "t=10" is _not_ a valid media fragment URI per our current syntax; >> - "t=10," does what you want >> Do you have any concern with that? > > well, from some kind of strict grammar-parsing point of view it is equivalent. If we modify [1], then yes, "#t=10" could be valid. But this is not currently allowed. > But I fear we'd end up spending a lot of time telling people that they > need to put an empty comma at the end of a url. In the case of hand-generated media fragment URI only. You can also expect that in most of the cases, users will 'click' on media fragments URI or have them generated using authoring tools. Personally, from my common sense: "#t=10" refers to a time point, and not to an interval while "#t=10," seems more accurate. > It's not grammatically incorrect, but I have two usability concerns: > firstly that it feels incomplete, I fear that your email has been cut. What are your two usability concerns? Cheers. Raphaël [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#naming-syntax -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 19:07:27 UTC