Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics) from Michael Hausenblas on 2009-04-18 (public-media-fragment@w3.org from April 2009)

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:07:07 +0200
To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C60FAB2B.3D6A%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>

All,

As of my actions [1] and  [2] regarding our ISSUE-3 I have now performed the
review of the IANA media types registry. The question was how many media
types in the audio-visual domain exist that define fragment identifiers and
if so, where potential clashes with our proposed syntax/semantics exist.

Short answer: 0.
Long answer: see my write-up at the Wiki [3]

I'm gonna close my actions now and move on with initiating the Test Cases.

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/42
[2] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/47
[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/MediaTypeReview

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/

Received on Saturday, 18 April 2009 14:07:48 UTC