- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:00:47 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
2009/4/15 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: >>> "???" meant to be "..." for reflecting the complete definition of the >>> polygon. >> >> If it's a polygon, it could be any point. None of the given points >> line up with each other, so I don't think there is a clear way to work >> out what the missing point is supposed to be. May I suggest using >> something more obvious like (40, 300), (40,210), (???), (320,300) - >> then the missing point is obivously (320, 210). Or am I >> misunderstanding coordinates? > > 1/ The MPEG-7 syntax has no parenthesis. > 2/ This is a polygon of arbitrary shape, that can have 50 points to be > defined. The "..." means all the points that might be used to define the > polygon. Oh! How is the computer supposed to interpret that? /me is still very confused Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 15:01:38 UTC