- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:35:05 +1000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Actually, the term "retrieval" is not that bad a term in this context - after all, HTTP talks about retrieving a resource. They are thus a single server-access retrieval operation, or a double server-access retrieval operation. Now, if only we could find something more dense to name these. I've just read up on the HTTP protocol and "partial GET". How about using "single-step partial GET" and "dual-step partial GET request" for 2-way and 4-way handshake? Silvia. 2009/4/11 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>: > Dear Conrad, > >> 2009/4/9 Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>: >>> >>> I was reading section 8, and I noticed that 2-way handshake was explained >>> in >>> the preamble as "single roundtrip". This struck me as a name that may be >>> better in getting the idea across, with "dual roundtrip" then being the >>> obvious candidate for 4-way handshake. >> >> How about "single retrieval" and "sequence of retrievals"? I think it >> would be clearest to avoid making up new names for a simple HTTP GET. > > Good terms are obviously difficult to find :-) > I don't like the term "retrieval" because it has already a well-defined but > different meaning in other communities, namely in the information retrieval > community that might (should) also be interested in this document. I like > "roundtrip" :-) I like even more asking the community at large 1/ whether > they are upset with the term 'handshake' or not? 2/ whether they can can > with a better term suggestion. > > This is the purpose of the editorial note that reads: > "In the following, we use the terms two-ways handshake when there is one > roundtrip and four-ways handshake when there is two roundtrips between the > UA and the server. We acknowledge that these terms are not necessarily > adequate and we seek suggestions for having better terms for naming these > processes." > > Consequently, I would leave the terms like that since with this ed note. > Cheers! > > Raphaël > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), > Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands > e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 > Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 > Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/ > > >
Received on Saturday, 11 April 2009 21:35:58 UTC