Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5

Dear Silvia,

> Will do what I can, but I'd rather promise the updates for after the
> long weekend...

Hum, we will talk about that tomorrow (today) on the call :-)
The problem is that W3C can publish documents on Tuesday and Thursday 
only. If we miss this week opportunity, then it will be for next week 
which collides with the F2F.

> a) framework within which we work to define media fragments
> b) use case scenarios in which we can imagine media fragment use and
> why some of them are out of scope (namely: because of the framework we
> have set ourselves) - the scenarios are there to explain use cases and
> to order them into different types, trying to make sure we have
> covered all aspects
> c) four dimensions of fragmentation that we consider as a consequence
> of the use cases
> 
> I think this flows more nicely. The "Requirements" are actually almost
> a "Terminology" section which is why I think this section should go up
> first.

Then what you call 'requirements' is not what I call 'requirements' but 
indeed, it is more a terminology issue. I would then also agree with 
your suggestion with the following changes:
   - Put the current section 4 into the section 2 - "Terminology"
   - Let the current section 3 as it is, this is our scenarios
   - The current section 5 becomes section 4 and is renamed as 
'Requirements', this is our 4 dimensions we can name as "req-x" and be 
referred back in each scenario.

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 22:31:15 UTC