Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?

May I suggest we take the Easter weekend to make improvements?
I still want to proofread the whole thing and apply the suggested
improvements to the first few sections...
Let's talk about it tonight.

Thanks,
Silvia.

2009/4/8 Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Jack Jansen a écrit :
>>
>> On 7 apr 2009, at 15:36, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>
>>> Heya :)
>>>
>>> If you want to replace formatting and make it more consistent, I think
>>> we're all happy for you to just go ahead. I have no problem with
>>> replacing <eg> with something more appropriate. I've used what I
>>> understood to be the correct markup, but I didn't spend much time to
>>> investigate. Your editing experience is certainly better than mine.
>>> I'm sure nobody will object to formatting improvements!
>>
>> Seconded.
>
> I agree, but I will certainly not claim to be an xmlspec expert, as this is
> also my first time I'm editing with it :-) I have no time to investigate
> formatting issues today, thus my attempt to distribute the workload to the
> responsible chapters ... but I'm ok for publishing as it is, and spend some
> time later to become an xmlspec guru.
>
>  Raphaël
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 22:08:17 UTC