- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:24:51 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On 7 apr 2009, at 15:36, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Heya :) > > If you want to replace formatting and make it more consistent, I think > we're all happy for you to just go ahead. I have no problem with > replacing <eg> with something more appropriate. I've used what I > understood to be the correct markup, but I didn't spend much time to > investigate. Your editing experience is certainly better than mine. > I'm sure nobody will object to formatting improvements! Seconded. We need someone to be our "xmlspec enforcement officer" who ensures that the source of the document is somewhat consistent. Like Silvia, I've glanced through the xmlspec docs and picked out the few things that seemed appropriate, but someone with more experience with xmlspec should go through the whole text. Hopefully this needs to be done only once, as for further edits the xmlspec-noobs will look at the existing code when deciding what sort of constructs to use. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:25:33 UTC