Thursday, 30 April 2009
- Re: [Transition Request] for "Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments"
- Re: ACTION-78: wiki page centralizing all WG resolutions
Wednesday, 29 April 2009
- ACTION-78: wiki page centralizing all WG resolutions
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- minutes of 2009-04-29 teleconference
- Re: [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 29 April, Telecon 1200 UTC
- Re: ISSUE-7 (UA MF resolution): User Agent Media Fragment Resolution
- RE: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- ISSUE 67: edit units spec
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
- Re: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- Re: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- Re: ISSUE-8 (MF WG decisions): Missing collection of MF WG decisions
- Re: ISSUE-7 (UA MF resolution): User Agent Media Fragment Resolution
- Re: [Transition Request] for "Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments"
- RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 29 April, Telecon 1200 UTC
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
- Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 29 April, Telecon 1200 UTC
- minutes of Barcelona 3rd F2F meeting (2009-04-16/17)
- Re: video annotation
- Re: video annotation
- Dates for Amsterdam meeting
- video annotation
Friday, 24 April 2009
Monday, 20 April 2009
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
Sunday, 19 April 2009
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- [MF-TC] Setup
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- Re: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
- Re: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
Saturday, 18 April 2009
- ISSUE-8 (MF WG decisions): Missing collection of MF WG decisions
- User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
- ISSUE-7 (UA MF resolution): User Agent Media Fragment Resolution
- Results of the media type review regarding fragment identifier (semantics)
Thursday, 16 April 2009
- [Transition Request] for "Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments"
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: next step for publication
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group welcome a new member: Opera
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
- Re: Dinner on wednesday night, anyone?
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group welcome a new member: Opera
- Media Fragments Working Group welcome a new member: Opera
- Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: next step for publication
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: taxi, dinner in Barcelona tomorrow?, etc.
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: Dinner on wednesday night, anyone?
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: Review of section 8
- RE: Review of section 8
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 8
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Dinner on wednesday night, anyone?
- Dinner on wednesday night, anyone?
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 6
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Call for Contributions: SAMT 2009 - 4th International Conference on Semantic and Digital Media Technologies
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake
Monday, 13 April 2009
- Re: Review of section 6
- Re: Review of section 6
- Re: Feedback on edits to sections 1-5 of WD
- Re: General remarks on the current state of the WD
- Re: Feedback on edits to sections 1-5 of WD
- Re: General remarks on the current state of the WD
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: General remarks on the current state of the WD
- Feedback on edits to sections 1-5 of WD
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
Sunday, 12 April 2009
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Re: Review of section 7
- Review of section 8
- Review of section 7
Saturday, 11 April 2009
- Re: Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake
- Review of section 6
- Re: Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake
Friday, 10 April 2009
Thursday, 9 April 2009
- Re: Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake
- Naming suggestion: single/dual roundtrip for 2-way/4-way handshake
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
- Media Fragment F2F meeting in Barcelona: logistics
- minutes of 2009-04-08 teleconference
- Re: Media URLs in WD
- Third F2F Meeting: draft agenda
- Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: WD unlocked
- Re: Media URLs in WD
- Media URLs in WD
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: General remarks on the current state of the WD
- Re: General remarks on the current state of the WD
- General remarks on the current state of the WD
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 08 April, Telecon 1200 UTC *NEW HOUR*
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 08 April, Telecon 1200 UTC *NEW HOUR*
- Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapter 8
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- ISSUE-6: Temporal clips that require transcoding
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- [comment] Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: Chapters 3, 4, 5
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Re: Action 53 - Check whether ffmpeg can be used from clipping and cropping
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- ISSUE-5: Handling spatial cropping requires information at client-side
- Re: Someone to review my WD chapter?
- Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 08 April, Telecon 1200 UTC *NEW HOUR*
Monday, 6 April 2009
Friday, 3 April 2009
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
Thursday, 2 April 2009
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
- Re: Description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways handshake
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Publication Schedule for the Media Fragment FPWD
- minutes of 2009-04-01 teleconference
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Re: Should we consider the user?
- Should we consider the user?
- Discovery and fallback for media segment addressing over HTTP
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 01 April, Telecon 0900 UTC
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 01 April, Telecon 0900 UTC