- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:35:43 +0200
- To: <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000f01c92786$23de6c50$6b9b44f0$@vandeursen@ugent.be>
Dear all, regarding the video resource model [1] proposed by Silvia: do we assume that any video (or media) resource will appear as described in the model, i.e., media resources packed in a container format? Various media resources are available as elementary bitstreams, not packed in any container format (e.g., mp3 audio files). We are working towards a format-independent URI-based fragment identifier mechanism, but what do we mean with 'format'? Coding formats, container formats, or both? I prefer both, since we cannot demand that all the media on the web is packed within a container IMO. Hence, for the moment, the model for media resources represents a 'full option' media resource, containing almost every possible media track and packed in a container. Maybe we should also specify which subsets are possible for this model? [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Glossary#Video_Resource Best regards, Davy -- Davy Van Deursen Ghent University - IBBT Faculty of Engineering Department of Electronics and Information Systems Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent Belgium t: +32 9 33 14893 f: +32 9 33 14896 t secr: +32 9 33 14911 e: <mailto:davy.vandeursen@ugent.be> davy.vandeursen@ugent.be URL: <http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/> http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 07:36:22 UTC