On 27-Nov-2008, at 13:22 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > When we did the temporal URI spec, we found that the best way to look > at temporal URIs is that they always specify a interval, and never > just a offset point. The only sensible use case for a single offset is > when one is trying to extract a keyframe at such an offset rather than > a media fragment - this could be done with content negotiation, but > may not be something we should consider. So, our assumption was that > the time always specified semi-open intervals: [20s,inf[ for #t=20s, > or [20s,40s[ for #t=20s-40s. I think this makes sense for us, too. Yeah! Semi-open intervals rule!! :-) BTW: I was thought to write those sem-open intervals either as "[20s, 40s>" (at school) or "[20s, 40s)" (at university). Is the "[20s,40s[" a notation I'm not aware of, or a typo? -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2008 22:24:25 UTC