W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Proposal: a f2f meeting in conjunction with IETF 102

From: Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:33:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHgZEq4LP4K1+o0n71oC7J685iRgT=YNtiOcPcQ-0wJcXvhtcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, WebRTC WG <public-webrtc@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
we are neutral in the matter, we would need to travel from far away in any
case.

preference would go to meetings just before or just after (no gap day), and
not overlapping with IETF itself, but again ,it s just a preference.

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
wrote:

> Friday/Saturday is OK with me (much better than Saturday/Sunday).
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:00 AM Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2018, at 9:27 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think meeting on a weekend would make it much more likely that we'd
>> miss important participants.  Personally, I'd vote strongly against a
>> Sunday meeting.
>>
>>
>> Would a Friday / Saturday meeting be reasonable or do you think we should
>> avoid Saturday as well?
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President - CoSMo Software Consulting, Singapore
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard

   -
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2018 08:33:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:41 UTC