Q: Status of mediastream-worker work and depth tracks?

At the Sapporo meeting, we had a presentation on depth tracks and
mediachannel-worker (with most of the presentation time given to
mediachannel-worker).

Our various charters can reasonably be read to say that we should take
care of stuff that can be captured analogously with audio and video -
thus depth was originally agreed to be in-scope, but not more important
than our first set of deliverables - but whether we're the right home
for the "mediaworker" project seems like a more unclear topic.

This note is intended to solicit opinions, given that our
mediacapture-main work seems to be closing in on completion:

- Should we (continue to) adopt mediacapture-depth as a TF item?
- Should we adopt the proposed mediacapture-worker as a TF item?
- What, if anything, needs to be done to our charters (TF, DAP and
WEBRTC) to make sure the work is clearly within the WG's scope?

Input sought!

Harald, for the chairs


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 13:07:16 UTC