- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:17:50 +0000
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2016-02-23 16:30, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 2/23/16 4:16 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> On RTCDataChannel we have an oredered attribute, that reflects the >> ordered setting used to create the object. If we want to be consistent >> on the type it gets a bit strange if people try to use it as a boolean >> (which the name suggests it is). >> >> var dc = pc.createDataChannel(label, {ordered: "unordered"}); >> >> !!pc.ordered is true (since !!"unordered" is true) > > Generally, naming an enum after one of its possible choices seems poor, > so if we switch ordered to be an enum we should probably call it > something else. That way, there should be no confusion with the ordered > attribute. > > How about "order"? Not different enough? That would be an improvement. Both for the settings dictionary member and the readonly attribute. /Adam
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 19:18:24 UTC