- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:26:00 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10/02/16 09:44, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 10 February 2016 at 07:56, Adam Bergkvist > <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote: >> Given that it's not clear in what state the "floating proposal" is in, >> it might be worth documenting our solution under the current >> circumstances (i.e. without the consensus for the "floating proposal"). >> With a note as Stefan mentioned. > > Is it possible to modify Donald Duck's car to remove the specifics of > the delegation mechanism and then try to get greater certainty about > this plan? > > I'm personally not yet convinced that this general approach (require > delegation) is going to float. I've not seen anything more concrete > than the Chrome figure of 3.5% of requests for permissions arriving in > iframes. Where did you get that figure? I noted that the "floating proposal" has some data, but there is no data for gUM and iFrames. One thought that struck me: would explicit delegation also apply to same-origin iFrames? I don't know what assessment others might make from this > information, or what additional information they might want in order > to make a decision, but on the face of it, this is too high a number > to break without a little more careful study. >
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 09:26:42 UTC