- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:01:42 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
It may have gotten lost in the flurry of issues raised yesterday, but this one is where I think the WG needs to have input. The question has Giri and me on opposite sides of the issue; we need more people to chime in. I've been assured that both approaches are implementable. Harald Den 07. des. 2016 13:21, skrev Harald Alvestrand via GitHub: > alvestrand has just created a new issue for > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image: > > == Use the constrainable pattern instead of creating a subtly > different function set == > The combination of getPhotoCapabilities (with both ranges and current > settings) and setOptions creates an almost equivalent set of > functionalities to the constrainable pattern used on MediaStreamTrack. > > Two nearly identical patterns is a bad thing for the platform. Please > reconsider. > > (This has been discussed before, and I know giri does not agree with > me. I wish for the discussion to be recorded as a top-level issue in > this tracker.) > > > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/124 using your GitHub > account >
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:02:19 UTC