- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:03:13 +0100
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > Well, ultimately this is a levy on the TF from the IETF. I'm happy to > discuss > this in the IETF context, but if IETF decides not to change it (and for the > record, my view is we should not) then we're going to be right back here. > >> FWIW, to me the question seem straightforward enough to handle in an >> off-line discussion. > > That may be, but IMO this present discussion is nowhere near enough to > override the IETF WG consensus on a document that has been through > WGLC. What kind of end-user testing did the IETF perform that makes it feel like it can impose such requirements? Historically the IETF has been quite poor at this, e.g. certain HTTP UI requirements come to mind. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2015 20:03:37 UTC