On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK < stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 10/03/15 16:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> My personal view is that it would still be nice to require sites to ask > >> for persistent permissions if they want them and that there should be a > getUserMedia() > >> flag to indicate that. > > > > None of the other APIs around permissions have this. Also, given > > users' tendency to click through dialogs, having non-persistent as > > default and persistent through a more active action seems better. > > Personally I agree to that a more active action should be required to > get a persistent permission. Would we (if people agree) need to put that > in the document, or will implementations converge here anyway? > I'm not sure that implementations will converge, since I suspect that Chrome and Firefox had reasons for their differential behavior. -EkrReceived on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 18:46:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:32 UTC