- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:35:22 +0200
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 07/03/2015 02:44 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > There is an open Issue for Media Capture and Streams proposing to use > [SameObject] ([1]) > > All discussion so far has happened in the Issue itself, but this is > something that should be discussed on the list. > > So, is the proposed change something we should consider doing? > > Stefan > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/204 > Just to make sure - [SameObject] will not invalidate any existing implementation, right? We never had language that permitted different objects to be returned? It is only information saying that "you can depend on this attribute remaining the same", kind of like "final" in Java? In that case, [SameObject] seems to me to "do no harm". -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Friday, 3 July 2015 16:35:55 UTC