- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:12:42 -0800
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 01/28/2015 07:52 AM, Josh Soref wrote: > Jan-Ivar wrote: >> Seems reasonable, except I don't like that this means that the >> permission prompt could change from under the user. The user could be >> about to hit "Allow" - intending to allow audio-only - when the request >> changes to video+audio, causing the users to accidentally grant more >> than they intended. > That's a QoI detail. The UA could detect that the user is w/in some interval > of interacting w/ the permission and freeze out updates. Or, if it doesn't > freeze out updates and the user interacts w/ the grant w/in some interval of > the change, the UA could split the prompt explaining that the permission > changed and give the user a choice. > > Or something else. UX implementation details are left to implementers to > innovate/improve. The spec just needs to not prevent UAs from doing something > reasonable. I think this is last paragraph is good guidance. -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 00:13:14 UTC