- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:46:53 -0500
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 1/28/15 10:20 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2015-01-28 6:29 GMT+01:00 Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>: >> Why would you call gUM again if you already have an outstanding request? > Because I need audio+video and the previous+prending gUM was just about audio. That's an interesting problem. I could be wrong, but I believe UAs are already allowed to bundle permission requests in order to bug the user less (none do today AFAIK). But again I see issues: In your case, lets say a UA were to replace the first audio-only prompt with the second audio+video prompt when the second request happens, and if the user allows it, resolve both requests. Seems reasonable, except I don't like that this means that the permission prompt could change from under the user. The user could be about to hit "Allow" - intending to allow audio-only - when the request changes to video+audio, causing the users to accidentally grant more than they intended. .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2015 15:47:22 UTC