- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:55:23 +0200
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Den 22. april 2015 19:16, skrev Martin Thomson: > On 21 April 2015 at 23:41, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> I certainly hope not to have this working group ten years from now. > > You sir, are a true optimist. > > Even if it is gone, do you think that browsers will lack a venue to > discuss coordination on matters like this? > It's hard to predict the future, and I don't want to do it more than I have to. RFCs in 2005 were numbered around 4000. Registries with defining RFCs in that range from http://www.iana.org/protocols: - RFC 3939 Caller-ID numbering plan tokens - RFC 4065: Seamoby IANA registries (5 registries) - RFC 4034: DS resource record digest algorithms and a bunch of other DS-related registries - RFC 4030 Authentication Suboption Algorithm Identifier Values - RFC 4044 Fibre Channel Port Types - RFC 4025 IPSECKEY Resource Record parameters - RFC 4037 OPES Callout Protocol - RFC 4032 Precondition types used with SIP Now, from the viewpoint of 2005, how would you guess which of these would have a viable community for evaluation of requests ten years later?
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 19:55:55 UTC