- From: Hu, Ningxin <ningxin.hu@intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:20:09 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Hi Harald, > This seems to be a multifaceted thing, since I don't know how a depth channel > should be represented across the network either; there are H.26x extensions for > carrying depth channels inside a video stream, but I'm not sure those extensions > are supported by the relevant RTP formats. > Thanks for the comments. I captured it as an issue [1] For depth representation across the network, what are your thoughts on 3D Video in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) [2]? > And how is a depth channel best represented if there's no associated video? For 3D video use case, depth channel should have associated video. However, for some use cases, such as depth-based hand tracking, it might only need depth info. WDYT? Thanks, -ningxin [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-depth/issues/12 [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-capelastegui-mmusic-3dv-sdp-00 > > > > > [This should not block the FPWD publication, however.] > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Anssi > > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-depth/issues/18 >
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 21:20:59 UTC