- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:21:11 +0000
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26526
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jib@mozilla.com
--- Comment #3 from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> ---
I think the existing epsilon covers inaccuracies in double just fine, and that
arguments to change it were in the opposite direction, chasing the problem of
interpreting expectations correctly of people entering decimals by hand.
I believe Harald proposed 1/1000 [1], and I indicated perhaps 1/100 as being
better, citing wikipedia [2] as evidence that accuracy-needs on aspect don't
rise with higher resolutions.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014Aug/0056.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014Aug/0084.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 16:21:12 UTC