- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:45 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 14:57:13 UTC
I share ekr's recollection. This was discussed in a full room at a F2F meeting. The consensus was that ruling out http altogether was too restrictive. - Jim On 9/10/2014 10:51 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl > <mailto:annevk@annevk.nl>> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com > <mailto:ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote: > > I don't remember this being > > primarily a question of test/demo pages as much as that there are > > lots of sites that aren't HTTPS and don't want to go HTTPS. > > Now we know about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7258 is it not time to > take a more active stance? I would love it if we could replay the > private debate here in the open. > > > There was no private debate. This was discussed at the RTCWEB WG > meeting. > > -Ekr >
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 14:57:13 UTC