Friday, 31 October 2014
- ConstrainablePattern on remote streams?
- [Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
- [Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
Thursday, 30 October 2014
- Re: Simplified slides
- Simplified slides
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
- [Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
- [Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- capture-ACTION-30: Make full review of getusermedia
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- Re: Agenda, updated (Media Capture)
Wednesday, 29 October 2014
- Agenda, updated (Media Capture)
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
Tuesday, 28 October 2014
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- [Bug 17704] suggest a parameter in getUserMedia
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
- [Bug 26810] Proposal: Introduce promises for device access
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- RE: Image Capture spec: new version
- Re: Image Capture spec: new version
- Image Capture spec: new version
Monday, 27 October 2014
- Re: Video preview proposal: grabPreview
- Re: Agenda TPAC
- Re: image capture and promises
- Re: Video preview proposal: grabPreview
- New mediacapture-main Editor's draft (v20141027)
- RE: image capture and promises
- Re: image capture and promises
- Re: Video preview proposal: grabPreview
- Re: Video preview proposal: grabPreview
Sunday, 26 October 2014
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Monday, 20 October 2014
- OverconstrainedError == ConstraintNotSatisfiedError?
- Introduce Promise's in gUM draft
- Re: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
- Re: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
- RE: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
- Re: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
Sunday, 19 October 2014
Saturday, 18 October 2014
- Re: TPAC agenda outline proposal
- Re: TPAC agenda outline proposal
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
Friday, 17 October 2014
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- RE: New Editor's Draft of MediaStream Image Capture
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- Re: MediaStreams and canPlayType
- MediaStreams and canPlayType
Thursday, 16 October 2014
- Re: [depth] PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
- Re: [Bug 27077] New: Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- RE: Comments on Image Capture draft
- Re: [depth] PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
- [Bug 27077] Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- [Bug 27077] New: Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- [minutes] October 2nd teleconf
- Re: [depth] PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
- Re: Time split for TPAC
Wednesday, 15 October 2014
- Re: [depth] PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
- Re: [depth] PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
- PFWG request for user-focused introduction and use cases
- Re: Most important values of "timeslice" in MediaStreamRecorder?
- Most important values of "timeslice" in MediaStreamRecorder?
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
Monday, 13 October 2014
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
- Re: Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
- Re: Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
- TPAC agenda outline proposal
- Status of Promise's in gUM discussion
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
Friday, 10 October 2014
- Re: Time split for TPAC
- Re: Time split for TPAC
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- track.ended promise (Re: Bug 26939 "what info does the app get when a track ends")
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Re: Bug 26939 "what info does the app get when a track ends" - where are we
- Re: Bug 26939 "what info does the app get when a track ends" - where are we
- Re: Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- Bug 26939 "what info does the app get when a track ends" - where are we
- Capabilities (Re: [Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified)
- Return value of getSupportedConstraints (Re: [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application)
- RE: Time split for TPAC
Thursday, 9 October 2014
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- [Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
- [Bug 26954] DeviceID, kind and label needs to be aligned with capabilities.
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- [Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
- [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- [Bug 26654] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Discussion on authenticated origins (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
- [Bug 25777] Capabilities seem under specified
- Re: Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Wild Tangent about Crypto (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- [mediacapture-depth] Advice on extending CanvasRenderingContext2D to support Depth Streams
- [mediacapture-depth] Changing how we define cameraParameters
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Discussion on authenticated origins (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: FPWD of Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions published
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- RE: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- FPWD of Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions published
- Discussion on authenticated origins (was Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia)
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
Tuesday, 7 October 2014
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- RE: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- RE: Time split for TPAC
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Time split for TPAC
- CfC: only allow authenticated origins to call getUserMedia
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
Monday, 6 October 2014
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- RE: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- RE: Time split for TPAC
- Time split for TPAC
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
Sunday, 5 October 2014
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
Saturday, 4 October 2014
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins #2
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
Friday, 3 October 2014
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Re: getUserMedia() and authenticated origins
- Re: Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Strawman Promises consensus position, based on Thursday's telechat
- Fwd: [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL
- Re: Request for FPWD of mediacapture-depth
Thursday, 2 October 2014
- Re: Request for FPWD of mediacapture-depth
- Re: Request for FPWD of mediacapture-depth
- [Bug 26918] DeviceID description needs to say that it's cookie linked
- Re: Promise slides
- [Bug 26953] Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 26954] New: DeviceID, kind and label needs to be aligned with capabilities.
- [Bug 26953] New: Volume needs to be defined
- [Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Promise slides
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- [Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
- [Bug 26111] need typedef of ConstrainVideoFacingMode
- [Bug 25810] Change all extensable enum to DomStrings
- [Bug 25794] Make facingMode a VideoFacingModeEnum again once enum default notation is supported in webidl.
- [Bug 25298] How to represent VideoFacingMode if browser is not able to detect the FacingMode of the camera.
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: !Promise slides
- Re: geolog
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- Re: Our error-handling is broken (Re: Promise slides)
- geolog