- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 19:31:58 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2014-05-21 17:40, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 21 May 2014 06:49, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> On 05/21/2014 09:29 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >>> On 2014-05-19 20:08, Martin Thomson wrote: >>>> On 19 May 2014 09:24, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK >>>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2014-05-18 20:47, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>>>>> I'd like to have a real good story for why it shouldn't be an event >>>>>> fired at some object before introducing a third pattern in this API. >>>>> >>>>> The story would be precedence - watchPosition works this way. I don't >>>>> know if that is a real good story or not! >>>> >>>> watchPosition sets a bad precedent. I prefer using events. >>>> >>> >>> I would prefer an event as well. The question is what object should be >>> the corresponding EventTarget. >>> >>> I don't see that FF or Chrome have the >>> navigator.<prefix>getMediaDevices() function yet. It would be nice to >>> have some object on navigator where we could isolate our new stuff >>> which also could be our EventTarget. >>> >>> navigator.userMedia.getMediaDevices(...); >>> >>> navigator.userMedia.ondevice = function (evt) { ... }; >> >> I like that. <bikeshed>Perhaps call it deviceManager?</bikeshed> >> >> Can you flush it into a complete proposal (WebIDL)? > > > partial interface Navigator { > void getUserMedia(MediaConstraints c, Callback success, Callback > fail); // legacy cruft > attribute DeviceManager deviceManager; > }; > > interface DeviceManager { > attribute SupportedConstraints supportedConstraints; > void getUserMedia(MediaConstraints c, Callback success, Callback fail); > sequence<DeviceInfo> enumerateDevices(); // or whatever it's called > attribute EventHandler? ondevicechange; > }; > I didn't dare to suggest to put gUM() in the new object as well, but I think that is something to pursue if possible (it's still prefxed). /Adam
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2014 17:32:24 UTC