Re: [Bug 25766] New: Problem with constraints failure when there is no constraint. from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey on 2014-05-19 (public-media-capture@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:31:27 -0400
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <537A5C0F.3090701@mozilla.com>

On 5/19/14 2:17 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 19 May 2014 10:28, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> I think it should fail.
> I'm confused.
>
> Unsupported = fail.

Yes.

>    Missing = ignore?

Yes.

>    Does that mean we interpret a missing value as being present but maximally permissive?

Absence means unconstrained, so effectively yes.

.: Jan-Ivar :.

Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 19:31:53 UTC