- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:24:10 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2014-05-13 17:28, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Summarizing the thread started by Bug 22337 (when does the light come > on) [1]: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2014Mar/thread.html#msg94 > > * it isn't clear whether the spec currently only talks about user-agent > indicators, or also about on-hardware indcators > > * there is mild disagreement about how much the spec should say at all > about any of these > > * there is no clear proposal as to whether these indicators should > express "in use" or "can be in use" > > My (perhaps controversial) proposal is that the spec should remain > silent on the topic of indicators for now (i.e. we should remove the > current text about indicators); as I've said in another thread, UI > considerations are in general better left for implementors to experiment > with, and UI experts are more likely to find the right expression than > spec writers. > > That being said, I think it would be useful to explicitly address the 3 > states ("can't be used", "can be used", "is used") in the privacy > considerations section of the spec, with some description of the > possible threats mentioned in the thread (e.g. intermittent usage of the > camera to hide its activity from the user). > > I can draft a change proposal toward that if this sounds like a > reasonable approach. This sounds like a reasonable approach to me. > > Dom > > > 1. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22337 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 14:24:35 UTC