- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:43:28 -0400
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 23:44:12 UTC
On 28/03/2014 6:55 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > > > Going slightly off-topic, shouldn't we be able to do this as well? > > - Use a bluetooth microphone, but if/when it's unplugged, fallback > to the built-in microphone. And vice-versa, if the bluetooth > microphone is plugged in mid-call, switch over to it. > > > You'll need to use gUM to get the BT mic when it's plugged in, but > yes, that should work. (I don't think auto-switching is reasonable or > expected.) I think it's both reasonable and expected. Here is a similar use-case that works today: 1. Start a phone call on an Android phone with Bluetooth enabled. 2. Initially voice input is coming from the phone microphone, and voice output from the phone speakers. 3. Now, walk into a Bluetooth-enabled car that has been previously-configured to sync with the phone. 4. The phone call seamlessly switches over from the phone to the car systems. Why should WebRTC be any different? I should be able to do the same, today, keeping the video recording/playback on the phone but switching over the audio to the car subsystems. Gili
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 23:44:12 UTC