- From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:53:22 -0700
- To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-075Ea+3JAXoMRwPeL6TKAcRg3-jR9bjh__n7Njh=M73A@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry - my concern was specifically about Jan-Ivar's proposal, and how it differs from the current proposal. On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:49 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Just to make sure understood you correctly, Jan-Ivar's proposal throws an > error on unknown mandatory constraints and you're saying that our proposal > should do the same. Is that correct? > > Gili > > > On 27/03/2014 4:46 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > > How does this design deal with the previously mentioned problem where it > wasn't clear how an unknown mandatory constraint should be handled? > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:21 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > >> Seeing as "prevent browser fingerprinting" is not listed as a >> requirement, I'd like to propose a Capability Enumeration API as a possible >> solution. >> >> As far as I'm aware, this solves all the requirements met by previous >> designs and more. The only downside is an increased ability to carry out >> browser fingerprinting but as Erik, Martin and I have brought up in the >> past: this is already a lost battle. >> >> As an aside, I find Jan-Ivar's new proposal easier to read than the >> current gUM API. I don't care much about WebIDL but readability is a big >> concern for me. >> >> >> Gili >> >> On 26/03/2014 8:23 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >> >>> I tried Justin's changes and I like it! >>> >>> So I think I'll present this slide-deck instead. >>> >>> .: Jan-Ivar :. >>> >>> On 3/26/14 12:35 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >>> >>>> Here are my slides for tomorrow's call. >>>> >>>> Please bear in mind that they don't reflect Justin's reasonable >>>> suggestion to divide things explicitly into video and audio. >>>> >>>> I am totally open to such renaming, but it doesn't functionally impact >>>> my presentation, so I think I'll present it as I have it, and hopefully we >>>> can discuss names at the end (I may come with a backup slide-deck). >>>> >>>> I hope that works for everybody. >>>> >>>> .: Jan-Ivar : >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 20:54:09 UTC