Re: Constraints 2014 new slides

Sorry - my concern was specifically about Jan-Ivar's proposal, and how it
differs from the current proposal.


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:49 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:

>  Hi Justin,
>
> Just to make sure understood you correctly, Jan-Ivar's proposal throws an
> error on unknown mandatory constraints and you're saying that our proposal
> should do the same. Is that correct?
>
> Gili
>
>
> On 27/03/2014 4:46 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
> How does this design deal with the previously mentioned problem where it
> wasn't clear how an unknown mandatory constraint should be handled?
>
>
>  On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:21 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>
>> Seeing as "prevent browser fingerprinting" is not listed as a
>> requirement, I'd like to propose a Capability Enumeration API as a possible
>> solution.
>>
>> As far as I'm aware, this solves all the requirements met by previous
>> designs and more. The only downside is an increased ability to carry out
>> browser fingerprinting but as Erik, Martin and I have brought up in the
>> past: this is already a lost battle.
>>
>> As an aside, I find Jan-Ivar's new proposal easier to read than the
>> current gUM API. I don't care much about WebIDL but readability is a big
>> concern for me.
>>
>>
>> Gili
>>
>> On 26/03/2014 8:23 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
>>
>>> I tried Justin's changes and I like it!
>>>
>>> So I think I'll present this slide-deck instead.
>>>
>>> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>>>
>>> On 3/26/14 12:35 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here are my slides for tomorrow's call.
>>>>
>>>> Please bear in mind that they don't reflect Justin's reasonable
>>>> suggestion to divide things explicitly into video and audio.
>>>>
>>>> I am totally open to such renaming, but it doesn't functionally impact
>>>> my presentation, so I think I'll present it as I have it, and hopefully we
>>>> can discuss names at the end (I may come with a backup slide-deck).
>>>>
>>>> I hope that works for everybody.
>>>>
>>>> .: Jan-Ivar :
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 20:54:09 UTC