- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:18:12 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2014-03-07 09:27, Martin Thomson wrote: >> --- Comment #2 from Shijun Sun <shijuns@microsoft.com> --- >> It seems okay to remove the addtrack event from the spec as long as the >> addtrack() call is synchronous. Same to the removetrack event (as mentioned in >> bug 24930). > > It's true that addTrack doesn't have any value for getUserMedia, but... > > For streams that come from RTCPeerConnection it is critical. It is > also possible that the event is useful for streams that come from > other sources, like webaudio or <video> or <audio> tags. > Right. The event is needed so the question is if it should remain in the gum spec or be moved to the webrtc spec. As I see it, the motivation for moving it to the webrtc spec is that that's were it's actually used for the first time. The reason for keeping it in gum is that other specs (like webaudio) don't need to reference the webrtc spec just to get the event. But I don't know if this is even a reason. /Adam
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 09:18:37 UTC