- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 18:10:50 -0400
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
- Message-ID: <539630EA.3070304@bbs.darktech.org>
I understand you're trying to summarize the consensus. The following questions are meant to give ideas for future revisions: 1. The opposite of "optional" is "exact"? :) How about "required"? 2. Does it make sense to "require" one of multiple values instead of just a single value? Example: I require one of X, Y, or Z (in that order of preference). Gili On 09/06/2014 5:33 PM, Peter Thatcher wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that the version that is commented > would be optional (if it were written "facingMode": "environment") > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Martin Thomson > <martin.thomson@gmail.com <mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Nit: > > On 9 June 2014 14:08, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com > <mailto:pthatcher@google.com>> wrote: > > // "facingMode": "environment" would be optional. > > facingMode: { exact: "environment" }, > > This means "environment or bust", not optional. > >
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 22:11:45 UTC