- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:03:07 +0200
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
2014-07-07 15:46 GMT+02:00 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>: > 2014-07-07 14:31 GMT+02:00 Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>: >> But there has also been the comment that this is behind vendor prefix > > The problem are vendor prefixes, which means that within next 8 years > there will still be JS code checking for webkitFoo, mozFoo, > blinkFoo... > > There is no advantage at all in adding vendor prefixes, no idea why > they still do that. I'm sorry for complaining about vendor prefixes in this thread, please ignore me. Regarding the original question, I strongly like "namespaces" (so may vote for navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia) but the fact is that JavaScript APIs do not usually use namespaces (for example, there is no a WebRTC namespace but, instead, we have top level classes like RTCPeerConnection, RTCIceCandidate and so on). I feel that navigator.getUserMedia is good enough. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 15:03:53 UTC