- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:20:50 +0000
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 09/01/14 18:22, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 1/9/14 10:11 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> On 01/09/2014 04:04 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >>> It's not needed by programs, except programs that would need to do >>> this anyway IMHO. I think we let this cat out of the bag when we said >>> "SDP parsing" was an API. It's not. It's an emergency access panel to >>> the implementation. >> >> To which viewpoint I agree..... >> >>> My point was quite specific: Line-number isn't enough to cover >>> Sylvia's rather ambitious code anyway, which likely would look like >>> this already to parse the error messages for clues, not to mention >>> browser-specific SDP tricks that might need to be dealt with, so this >>> seems par for the course. Who needs a silver spoon to eat out of >>> trashcans? >> >> But SDP, for all its faults, has a specified grammar. So an SDP parser >> can parse any compliant SDP, and "line number" has a specific meaning. >> No browser implementor governs the syntax of SDP. I noted that reporting line number in errors is also done for Workers (http://www.w3.org/TR/workers/#runtime-script-errors) - so there is some precedence.
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 15:21:58 UTC