Re: No-change proposals for WebIDL for constraints from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2014-01-02 (public-media-capture@w3.org from January 2014)

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:06:09 +0000
To: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <harald@alvestrand.no>, <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CBBC3DF8-8BFE-4A5C-B6B2-1B104D38ECA1@nokia.com>

are security risks associated with Object a reason not to go with Alternative 1? (discussed earlier in thread)

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:46 AM, ext Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:

> I think we should be pragmatic and choose Alternative 1 and move on.

Received on Thursday, 2 January 2014 17:14:33 UTC