We have not even scheduled a time to talk about it with the WG or task force yet so uh… yah, I expect that conversation to happen. On Feb 21, 2014, at 5:26 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > Before we consult the TAG, I would like us to consult the work group (not the task force) and ask them what they think. I think that is a logical step to do first. > > There has been some discussion --- which wasn't entirely unproductive --- but I don't think anyone's position has really changed. Should we consult the TAG now or are you expecting something else to happen? > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o wReceived on Friday, 21 February 2014 09:23:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC