W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Conclusions from the constraints spec review

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:50:35 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaW6d4Sb5d2UemsYui8DyToEE4ODuLQvzwS18v05q50MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

> It started out with a review of the current proposal for the writeup of
> the constraint mechanism. So far, we've had a lot of discussion (mainly
> among J-I, roc and myself) about whether it's worth abstracting that
> away from the use case it was originally created for (getUserMedia,
> where I think we have rough consensus to keep it more or less exactly
> as-is),

In my message "More thoughts on Constraints, and a proposal", I described
some objections to the Constraints abstraction being used anywhere,
including getUserMedia.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 09:51:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC