W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Conclusions from the constraints spec review

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:50:35 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaW6d4Sb5d2UemsYui8DyToEE4ODuLQvzwS18v05q50MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:

> It started out with a review of the current proposal for the writeup of
> the constraint mechanism. So far, we've had a lot of discussion (mainly
> among J-I, roc and myself) about whether it's worth abstracting that
> away from the use case it was originally created for (getUserMedia,
> where I think we have rough consensus to keep it more or less exactly
> as-is),


In my message "More thoughts on Constraints, and a proposal", I described
some objections to the Constraints abstraction being used anywhere,
including getUserMedia.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 09:51:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC