On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote: > It started out with a review of the current proposal for the writeup of > the constraint mechanism. So far, we've had a lot of discussion (mainly > among J-I, roc and myself) about whether it's worth abstracting that > away from the use case it was originally created for (getUserMedia, > where I think we have rough consensus to keep it more or less exactly > as-is), In my message "More thoughts on Constraints, and a proposal", I described some objections to the Constraints abstraction being used anywhere, including getUserMedia. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o wReceived on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 09:51:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC