W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Constraints and MediaRecorder

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:49:34 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaSzXnOHWvJvzAwXOVmrYX2csKhDkgsE1aEG1riojGbKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> I'm surprised to hear you put it this way. You mean that there might be
> some value you could indicate in the API but that you can't determine
> if you got because the WG had decided you didn't have a good enough
> use case for that? Why is that a good idea?

Because we don't add features that don't have use-cases.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Sunday, 9 February 2014 22:50:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC