- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:35:02 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 6 February 2014 12:02, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > Is it interesting to think of adopting the captureStream() interface? It > would resolve a long standing issue of "how do I produce a MediaStream when > I don't have a camera", but there might be dragons lying in wait here that > makes this unadvisable at the present time.... I think that this is a useful construct. In the code I've seen, it's used as the primary way to feed webaudio. BTW, the spec I found was http://www.w3.org/TR/streamproc/ . I don't know which of the two is more current. I also think that it would be interesting as a more general concept (think tab capture), but that's where the dragons lie in wait for us. For media elements, we've a pretty good handle on how this should work I think (with room for refinement, no doubt).
Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 17:35:30 UTC