Re: Conclusions from the constraints spec review from Harald Alvestrand on 2014-02-07 (public-media-capture@w3.org from February 2014)

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:06:56 +0100
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Message-ID: <52F4DA70.2040407@alvestrand.no>

On 02/07/2014 06:01 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Having constrainable in a separate doc was never really the goal in my opinion--just having it defined as a separate reusable interface was all that was needed. Putting aside the utility of the interface itself, if the issue can be solved by re-integrating it into one or the other of the other specs, then we could agree to just do that.

The issuing of the version of getusermedia.html that has only the
constrainable interface was only ever a device to focus the minds of
reviewers. We intend to put the rest of the text back around it ASAP!

Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 13:07:27 UTC