- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 07:17:31 +1300
- To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:18:09 UTC
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote: > Is this a proposal for GUM for Recording or both? Both. Paragraphs 1-4 apply to both. The rest demonstrates how the abstract thinking in those paragraphs might work out concretely for MediaRecorder. I really don’t want to do Recording in a completely different way than we > do GUM. > The point of my argument is that sharing the "Constrainable" interface between Recording and GUM is a mistake. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 18:18:09 UTC