W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Constraints and MediaRecorder

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:49:39 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZGYvNecBkYjNUS2Wfq7GsVX+kqkUtpg==U4kxE9Kz_Tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

> The constraint API has moved to support more or less exactly what you
> propose below but calls it a setting.

You mean MediaRecorder could be amended to use a Setting dictionary a la
section 11.4 of

OK, but the question remains, what justifies pulling the semantic
complexity of Constraints into MediaRecorder?

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2014 22:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC