W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Constraints and MediaRecorder

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:49:39 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZGYvNecBkYjNUS2Wfq7GsVX+kqkUtpg==U4kxE9Kz_Tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

> The constraint API has moved to support more or less exactly what you
> propose below but calls it a setting.
>

You mean MediaRecorder could be amended to use a Setting dictionary a la
section 11.4 of
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/archives/20140130/getusermedia.html?

OK, but the question remains, what justifies pulling the semantic
complexity of Constraints into MediaRecorder?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2014 22:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:24 UTC