Re: Constraints and MediaRecorder

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

> The constraint API has moved to support more or less exactly what you
> propose below but calls it a setting.
>

You mean MediaRecorder could be amended to use a Setting dictionary a la
section 11.4 of
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/archives/20140130/getusermedia.html?

OK, but the question remains, what justifies pulling the semantic
complexity of Constraints into MediaRecorder?

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w