- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:27:21 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "Benjamin Schwartz" <bemasc@google.com>, "Hu, Ningxin" <ningxin.hu@intel.com>, "Rob Manson" <roBman@buildAR.com>
Hi Harald, Stefan, On 28 Aug 2014, at 14:36, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 28/08/14 13:06, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> On 08/28/2014 09:57 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote: [...] >>> Chairs - do you have suggestions for the FPWD timing that would work for the group the best? For example, are you expecting to publish other TF deliverables before TPAC? We may want to try to publish at the same time to minimize the process-related overhead for the chairs and the team. >> >> Speaking for myself.... >> >> FPWD is usually not a high overhead process. I think we should do this >> whenever the editors feel that the draft is reasonably readable - my >> quick glance says that it looks ready now. >> >> Other docs go out as editors' drafts whenever we feel like it, and >> pushes to working drafts are few and far between; we expect a working >> draft to go out when we last-call getusermedia, of course. >> >> I wouldn't bother too much about the timing; let's push it out when it >> looks ready. > > I was about to send a mail with the same message, so +1 from me. Thanks for the quick response. After the group participants have had time to review the latest proposal, the editors have incorporated the feedback from the group and addressed the TODO in CanvasRenderingContext2D interface, I'd suggest we initiate the process of publishing the FPWD. Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 12:27:53 UTC